Parallels Forums
> Archives > Parallels Desktop for Mac  
Parallels vs. Boot Camp  
  

Parallels vs. Boot Camp

Apr 6, 2006, 09:12 AM
#1  

reggie
Junior Member


Join: Apr 2006
Posts: 7
Parallels vs. Boot Camp
...hopefully I won't get beat up by the Parallel's staff for asking this one. :)

Has anyone compared the Parallel Beta to the Boot Camp Beta? Just wondering what the difference in speed is (if any).

Regg'
Apr 6, 2006, 09:33 AM
#2  

WhoAmI
Junior Member


Join: Apr 2006
Posts: 7
Well, Parallels has the advantage of not requiring a re-boot just to switch over to a Windows application. Using ISO images in the Parallels eternal hardware emulation is also considerably faster than having to use the actual CDs under BootCamp/WinXP.

Being that Parallels is a virtualizer, it's already very fast. I find that the mouse input is way too slow and jaggy for detail work under Parallels, so far, and that I would prefer BootCamp there. I hope Parallels can find a fix for that problem soon, because then I'd remove BootCamp for good.
Apr 6, 2006, 09:47 AM
#3  

reggie
Junior Member


Join: Apr 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks WhoAmI. I'll be getting a new MacBook Pro soon (tomorrow) and will more than likely try both solutions. I'm a Mac using Windows Admin so so I need to use Windows at work.
Apr 6, 2006, 09:51 AM
#4  

burgeke
Junior Member


Join: Apr 2006
Posts: 29
I think both have a place.

Boot Camp is really just a dual boot with Apple provided Windows drivers. For someone who will regularly spend time in Windows, this is a good fit. For me, I prefer a VM with Windows since I only need Windows for the occasional web site (i.e. my online college) that requires Internet Explorer.
Apr 6, 2006, 10:48 AM
#5  

WhoAmI
Junior Member


Join: Apr 2006
Posts: 7
Of course they both have a place. However, if Parallels offered speedier input/graphics, then applications such as Rhino could be run from directly within the VM, instead of requiring a tedious reboot. I'd prefer that over BootCamp any day, but current VM speeds don't allow me to uninstall BootCamp.
Apr 6, 2006, 08:14 PM
#6  

s.cresswell
Junior Member


Join: Apr 2006
Posts: 16
We've trialled both Boot Camp (yesterday) and Parallel (this morning). Parallel is good to work with. The tools were impressive.
I agree with other posts that both have there place in the Mac world.
Boot camp (as far as betas go) had substantially better UI than Parallel - but again two different creatures.
The CD behavior is annoying. That you have to reboot the VM every time you want to change CD (unless I'm missing something).
Also the lack of USB support in this version was disappointing.
Support of Win 95 as a guest is pretty great. And I'm sure that Parallel will do well with no sign of Virtual PC being made for the Intel macs.

Will put a post again after we try playing Red Faction through boot camp later :p

__________________
Sean Cresswell
Software Tester
Apr 6, 2006, 08:35 PM
#7  

jmaynard
Junior Member


Join: Apr 2006
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoAmI
However, if Parallels offered speedier input/graphics
Have you tried installing the Parallels Tools? ALso, have you tried lowering the display acceleration a notch? Both of those markedly improve performance.
 


Thread tools Display modes
Hybrid Mode