tgrogan wrote: "No it doesn't say that - it says this: "Discuss and share useful tips and ideas that help you use Parallels software."
OK, let's do some analysing:
There are some inferrances, here, that obviously you expect everybody to translate according to your own traditions, when in fact it appears that your own traditions are quite a bit short-sighted.
"Discuss and share" cannot happen unless two or more people are paricipating. Two or more people cannot participate unless somebody "spills the beans" first. So how's that gonna happen?
Let's see, a guy could assume what he has to say is relevant to everybody else, to their particular platform, and exactly the same problem that another person (which he has no idea who that could be until they chime in his thread) has. Or, imagine this, a person in need could ask a question to which somebody else could "share" their useful "tips and ideas that help [them] use Parallels software."
tgrogan (and really how many other forum participants?) apparently want to control that content to be restricted to his/her own interpretation of what it means to "discuss and share useful tips and ideas that help you use Parallels software." Apparently, "...ideas that HELP you use Parallels software" (according to his/her interpretation of what is, what has been, and what is to come) does not include answering questions, just blogging your experiences. And, of course, anybody that will traverse this interpretation are "inconsiderate" and fail to read plain English.
???
When a guy has something in his head, it's pretty much gonna stay there even if it means misery in the end. And isn't that what tgrogan comes across as? A miserable guy that is tired of people posting in a location that on the surface (plain English) looks right, but according to his own whims, isn't?
How is tgrogan going to discuss and share useful tips and ideas that help him use Parallels software if nobody asks him questions? How are any of us? Let's say, for instance, tgrogan finds something in his use of Parallels that really saves him time and effort, and he posts that on the forum here. I suppose that this is the kind of content he expects to see.
But what is the expected result of such a post? Should we all expect that nobody will want to find out more, specific to their platfom perhaps, about how-to do what he introduces? According to his traditions, the thread would then have to be moved to the appropriate section of the forum, because it has changed it's nature from a how-to thread to a Q&A on highly technical issues.
So what, tgrogan, is an appopriate thread in this section of the forum? I'm not the only one that has ever asked you this question. And I haven't ever seen you answer it directly -- only by stating what ISN'T appropriate (yes, you're real good at telling us what isn't appropriate). I'd like you to make some suggestions on what is appropriate, and then I'll judge your suggestions according to your own statements that you have taken upon yourself to express to us in your mad-at-the-world manner.
Now typically someone would say I'm picking a fight here, but according to my own narrow-minded perogative, I'm only trying to establish some definition to your tradition, so that we all can be more "considerate" to you when we come searching for someone to share their "help" using Parallels software. Plain english, dude. Plain english.
Last edited: Dec 16, 2006