Oh, of course. Excellent observation on Stefan's configuration. I had not considered that, either.
I am somewhat biased by a previous experience. My first Mac was a Mac IIx, which I still think of from time to time. I purchased it in 1989, and I really loved that machine. First computer, first love. Sort of like first aircraft, first love. It shipped with 4MB of memory, while the earlier Mac II shipped with only 1MB. My brother purchased an identical Mac IIx. The Mac IIx provided eight SIMM slots. It shipped with four of the slots populated with 1MB SIMMS and the other four slots empty. Once I installed Mac OS 7 (from 6.0.3) and started taking greater advantage of multitasking, it was running out of memory often. I found a bargain on memory, so he and I both upgraded from 4MB to 20MB at the same time. At the time, the $150 per 4MB SIMM seemed like a bargain. It was. We were immensely pleased with our 20MB Macs, and could do anything with them. I began to double the memory allocation in Get Info in my most important applications. This added a considerable amount of stability to daily operations. Even with ten applications running at double the memory allocation, the memory usage didn't even approach 20MB.
So, those fond memories (no pun intended) are biasing me towards upgrading my business iMac to 16GB. Fortunately, I don't use Parallels on my home iMac (mid-2010, 27-inch, Quad-Core i7, 8GB, 2TB), and the video card uses dedicated memory, not system memory. With twelve applications running, the memory usage barely exceeds 4GB.
Kurt Todoroff
Last edited: Oct 24, 2012