Separate names with a comma.
Maybe it's a good thing the $39 option wasn't extended. Looks like it may have saved me some headaches.
As mentioned above, it's the principle as much as the $10. I am not using my original purchase. I don't feel burned because it was still a good...
That's what you chose to call it. Public beta, in common use, means open-to-the-public beta. It's a synonym for open beta. Most people just call...
It's still the the same complaint. I have previously demonstrated dissatisfaction with the offer by not accepting it until being able to try it...
I guess you weren't around for the last pre-order period, where they offered exactly that.
I don't know if that was an attempt at a joke, or if you really don't know. I'll just go with my hunch: that's what's called a closed -- or...
Which is exactly the point of the complaint. The period expired before you could even try it. Not only do I consider that unfair to current...
The problem -- obviously -- was the chosen expiration date. Ignoring the entire point of the topic just so you can post a pedantic reply? Well,...
Removing the $39 upgrade option before releasing even a public beta of the release is just wrong. It's asking for a leap of faith when some...
I got Vista to boot by changing acceleration from "high" to "normal".
On my Mac Pro, I can now get Vista to boot, but running a highly processor-intensive task still crashes the OS unless it's reduced to Normal --...
Is Vista RC1 working for anyone with High acceleration? (preferably on a Mac Pro)
I can't get Vista RC1 (clean installation in a new VM) to successfully boot with High acceleration set (regardless of VTx setting). Reducing speed...
Doesn't work here -- the agent quits a few seconds in. Vista RC2 (5744).
One problem I've found: on a two display system, both screens flip. Ideally it should just be one (preferably the one the app is open on, or the...
