I disagree with the posting of screenshots for a number of reasons:
1. This is not VMware provided information, therefore is very likely to be wrong, misinterpreted and cause more harm than good, at this point in the product cycle.
2. Fusion is a private beta so at least one less than trustworthy invitee to the program has stolen VMware's intellectual property and violated their agreement with VMware. (If this sounds like: "blah, blah, everyone does this and blogs about it"...doesn't make it right). VMware trusted their testers, and this is how they re-pay them.
3. As a developer, I would not want my unfinished alpha work compared to another's final product, even if somethings were "better", etc. Unfinished means that. Fusion, whenever it's released, could be a lot different than what is leaked. Everyone needs to learn: leaks hurt more than help. I cite Apple's past as proof.
4. People who are really interested in finding about Fusion, don't have to find out about it here. There are plenty of rumor sites and blogs that traffic in this kind of illicit junk, why copycat it here?
5. Out of respect for Parallels - again I ask, would you go post links to screenshots of Parallels or Parallels collateral on VMware's forums to 'encourage competition?' I'm sure both camps are aware of each other you (figuratively) don't need to act like a childish third party trying to get your way on this feature or that.
Last edited: Nov 11, 2006