while i'm loathe to defend parallels, i do feel the need to point out a couple of things:
1. parallels is a company. releasing new software costs money. if they were the size of apple / microsoft, they could afford to give away copies of their product gratis. however most developers understand that to keep stay in business, we have to charge for our efforts. so we generally give "upgrade" pricing. instead of requiring our users to purchase another full-price copy, we provide it at a discount as long as the user has an older copy. so the decision has to be made - stop writing software and only support customers up to a certain level of operating system, or support new features available in newer OSes and stop supporting legacy. it's a trade off, and sometimes users get caught on the wrong side of the fence.
2. yes, microsoft "supports" xp to a degree. the last update to the software was 5 years ago. it's not being marketed, it's not featured in hardware builder's advertisements... it's only "supported" in the sense that it's not deactivated / dead. in this regard, parallels 7 is the same. it's still running on your older OS.
3. you forgot to rant about apple not supporting PPC binaries meaning you had to upgrade all those old System 9 applications you have laying around.
anyone know how to get hypertalk installed on mavericks... damn
*i write this as a parallels users since the first release. i used PD up to 7, then saw no need to upgrade to PD8 as it was running well and i was happy. if i could run PD7 under mavericks i would. however, it doesn't, so yes i was "forced" to upgrade. do i wish i could stay with PD7 + mavericks? of course. but that's not how it went down, so i upgraded.*
Last edited: Nov 18, 2013