xochi raised a question I was wondering about, too. It is quite logical that dynamic disks are slower than static ones due to all the administration overhead both in Parallels and the host OS when new space needs to be allocated.
However, the rate in which allocations of new space happen will lose momentum over time. Deleting files in the guest OS frees disk space that can be used later to store new data. After sufficient uptime of the guest OS, administration overhead will mostly amount to nothing more than checking if there is sufficient free disk space in the dynamic disk.
I wonder if the Parallels develpment team has tested this.
Bye, Shaun
p.s.: The reason for posting this was the exact point Pleiades is making. On installation of Parallels, I had 80 GB of my 120 notebook drive available. Back then, I found static VMs to be a good idea (speed, speed, speed). Due to heavy mathematical computations with tons of output I now need about 60 GB spare disk space - and would like to try BootCamp, too. So 160 GB are on their way but I'd still like to switch to dynamic VMs to save even more space.
Last edited: Sep 21, 2006