Separate names with a comma.
I second this notion.
Yeah, the builds of 3186 and 3188 are official releases of version 2.5 but maybe not the final release. It's like dkp said, all official...
Good question.
That's extremely interesting. So 3186 and 3188 were official releases of version 2.5 but not the final release. So we can at least expect one...
Thank you Resolver! Your post ought to be a sticky, don't you think? Also, is 3188 the final build of 2.5?
I've been noticing a couple of new people from Parallels posting in here. So would you please tell us what's the difference between 3186 and 3188.
BTW, I had absolutely no problems with build 3188 either.
It's always smart to go with the latest release. At least that's what I think.
It's 3170, because 3170 was a beta itself. Anyway, it'd be pretty nice if Parallels Just explained this to us. Is this too much to ask????
So 3188 is really ready to support Leopard? How do you know that?
Same with my iMac. :D
I doubt it. 3186 was already Leopard ready.
That's a very damn good question.
This is absolutely hilarious! 3D will be on 3.0. However how can you talk about betas for 3.0 when Parallels hasn't even decided on their...
http://www.parallels.com/en/download/desktop/ It says 3188 March 07, 2007 on Parallels' official download page.
For me, no word on the new release of 3188 is annoying. Frankly, I think it's poor business especially when some of your customers are asking for...
No, both 3186 and 3188 are finals of version 2.5 because Parallels doesn't put betas or RCs on their official download page. Again Parallels...
Is 3188 really, really the final, final of version 2.5???? :confused: Any word from the Parallels team would be nice here.
Their beta 2 now works with my Mac Morse code system. So I'm now trying it. Parallels starts up much faster. I think I like the feel of...
I love 3186. It's faster and the all around feel is better, for me anyway.
