A ahancock Bit poster Jun 26, 2006 #1 which is going to be better/faster/more stable in the long run? Running XP in its own Hd partition (not a boot camp one) or in an image file as default? TIA
which is going to be better/faster/more stable in the long run? Running XP in its own Hd partition (not a boot camp one) or in an image file as default? TIA
B bartho Member Jun 27, 2006 #2 ahancock said: Running XP in its own Hd partition (not a boot camp one) or in an image file as default? Click to expand... Parallels stores the virtual hard drive in one big file in either case, and having a dedicated partition for a single file makes little sense.
ahancock said: Running XP in its own Hd partition (not a boot camp one) or in an image file as default? Click to expand... Parallels stores the virtual hard drive in one big file in either case, and having a dedicated partition for a single file makes little sense.
A ahancock Bit poster Jun 27, 2006 #3 ok, thanks. I was hoping it would be possible to create a partition to run the OS from, but no matter, things are working fine. Thanks for the reply.
ok, thanks. I was hoping it would be possible to create a partition to run the OS from, but no matter, things are working fine. Thanks for the reply.
