For those of you who'd like to compare Parallels with VMWare's Fusion product, be advised they've (VMWare) released a new Fusion beta version. I'm a very big supporter of Parallels, but it is valuable to learn more about this VM process when you study alternatives. To be honest my experiences have affirmed my purchase of Parallels was a good choice, but I still want to know what else is out there. An informed public is a healthy thing and good for consumers and good for business. What that means is, don't give me any crap for sharing this information. I'm just the messenger, keep an open mind - these products will continue to evolve and the more you know the better off you are.
Now here's what I think you're going to notice: Parallels is rather better polished and suited to the non-geek end user. Fusion has snapshot capability and limited 3D video. It already had and has tools for Solaris and Linux. Parallels has coherence, Fusion does not. Each side has something the other has not.
Now here's what I think you're going to notice: Parallels is rather better polished and suited to the non-geek end user. Fusion has snapshot capability and limited 3D video. It already had and has tools for Solaris and Linux. Parallels has coherence, Fusion does not. Each side has something the other has not.