[Licensing] Use one license on several personal computers

Discussion in 'Parallels Desktop for Mac Feature Suggestions' started by RyanM8, May 31, 2017.

?

Easy to use facility to switch license between computer systems

  1. Yes, great. need one

    127 vote(s)
    93.4%
  2. No

    9 vote(s)
    6.6%
  1. GarthS

    GarthS Bit Poster

    Messages:
    13
    The current licensing policy has become problematic for me, as I now have an M1 Mac. I still need to run Windows apps without emulation and macOS guests with full Parallels support, so I'm keeping my Intel Mac as well and double-boxing them through Apple's Universal Control system. I was hoping to run an ARM version of Windows on the M1 (under Parallels) and keep the older system going on my Intel Mac, but of course that's not possible.

    I'm still a single-seat user running exactly the same complement of VMs. They just happen to be split across two computers, both of which are within arm's reach. I don't think it's reasonable for the cost of Parallels to double because of this.
     
  2. AHunter3

    AHunter3 Bit Poster

    Messages:
    39
    Some software products will let you install and use applications on more than one workstation -- just not at the same time. Why not implement that?
     
  3. brad-x

    brad-x Bit Poster

    Messages:
    10
    That actually is implemented with Pro, you can transfer the license from machine to machine. So that's great - worth the bump in price IMO - I'd take another pricing tier for a "3 Macs at a time" license tho
     
  4. DebasmitaM@Parallels

    DebasmitaM@Parallels Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Hello, as per the End User License Agreement terms and conditions, one Parallels Desktop for Mac license can only be used for a single Mac, please refer to this KB article to know about Parallels Desktop for Mac licensing policy.
     
    brad-x likes this.
  5. brad-x

    brad-x Bit Poster

    Messages:
    10
    Thanks for the link! I should have added - only one instance can be activated at a time
     
  6. DebasmitaM@Parallels

    DebasmitaM@Parallels Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Hello, your most welcome.
     
  7. Forge

    Forge Bit Poster

    Messages:
    1
    Just adding my voice to the chorus; I've been a happy VMware user for many years, at home and at work, and I'm currently a Parallels subscriber because and only because VMware keeps failing to deliver a usable product on M1. I do a lot of work in VMware, some in Fusion, and the lack of a working M1 Fusion has led me here. While having Parallels makes my M1 Mac minimally usable, the rest of my computers and environments mean I'm native on VMware's stack, not yours, and if they deliver a working M1 Fusion in the next year (which is very likely), my subscription will not get renewed.

    It's not a threat (what do you care about one license more or less?), but instead an opportunity to win mindshare. There is an awful lot VMware delivers that you don't, and I doubt you want to, like ESX, but having a working M1 product is a major opportunity.

    Making the license many computers-one user would make me much more likely to flip all of my Macs to Parallels than Fusion, just to make import/export faster and easier. I'd still have to work around ESX being the heavy lifter around here, but you'd at least have an opportunity. With one-license-equals-one-computer, you're just an outlier, waiting to be enough of a difficulty to merit homologization of my workflows.

    While a standard issue mass-minted MBA will only see "We would reduce the total number of licenses sold if we allowed multiple machines", someone with more vision will see that you're also taking up more workloads and getting more face time.

    Maybe you want to stay the second fiddle to VMware. That's cool. I expect VMware to ship a working M1 client in the next six months, so I'll have lots of easy overlap time before my license runs out. If your licensing was just a little easier for power users to leverage, though, you could possibly take a chunk of VMware's Mac business away from them. Your call.
     
  8. juanc34

    juanc34 Bit Poster

    Messages:
    1
    I think your license should be bind to the user, not the computer. Because I need to switch from my imac to macbook occasionally and getting a second license is not worth it. I have Jetbrains toolbox subscription, I think this feature is really required!,I don't see how allowing two installs would hurt their bottom line, but then, I don't know the entire picture either.
     
  9. DebasmitaM@Parallels

    DebasmitaM@Parallels Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Hello, you can transfer a license to another Mac, but maximum three times.
     
  10. BenR15

    BenR15 Bit Poster

    Messages:
    1
    Just adding my voice.
    I have just bought Parallels as I upgraded to a M1 at work and laptop. To my surprise (yes should I read the BS) you have to jump loops and at a max of three time to swap activation/license the my current computer that I'm using. I only need it running one computer at a time (when I'm at work main computer, on the road or at home on laptop) never simultaneous. So as I've paid for the year, just going to use at works computer, but not going to continue the subscription. Have just installed VMware fusion preview and windows 11 (this is harder to do that Parallels but it does work). Parallels is very nice, and would continue to use, but the current licensing policy needs changing.
     
  11. John110

    John110

    Messages:
    1
    I am right now purchasing VMware Fusion instead of a 2nd copy of Parallels because of what I've learned in this exact thread. I need to use a VM on my Desktop when I'm in my office and on my laptop when I'm on the road. Even Adobe allows this type of usage!
     
  12. murphy9

    murphy9 Bit Poster

    Messages:
    1
    Looking at this long thread it's clear that Parallels has become an ogre company. Even Adobe allow 'multiple install, single use' of their products such as lightroom or photoshop (actually they allow TWO concurrent active apps as standard). As Parallels actually checks its activation every time you launch it this is something that could easily be instigated. I paid for the annual subs last year but due to this greedy approach I've not renewed the subscription. The moral perspective is simple, subscriptions allow you to 'pay to use' this should be regardless of what you use it on. Parallels practice is wholly inflexible, arcane and greedy. Once VMware address the M1 properly I expect a mass exodus to Fusion. For me this is less hasta la vista, and more good bye Parallels.
     
  13. Excelmate

    Excelmate Bit Poster

    Messages:
    5
    Spot on. I have a Mac Studio in the office and a MBP I take with me to clients / beach bar :) when I fancy a scenery change / home when absolutely necessary. I currently only have parallels on the MBP, to save on a second licence, & I have a manual switch of amazon now to swap the screen between mbp & ms but it is a pain in the sear! Plus my MBP is ancient so really want to be running on the studio!
     
  14. JohnW82

    JohnW82 Bit Poster

    Messages:
    2
    One license should be used for one computer. This is the best practice.
     

Share This Page