rsovitzky@mac.com said:
I can see where that may work, and I have the experience/expertise to do that. That is a very involved, non-friendly procedure.
BUT, with all due respect, I find that unacceptable. Could you explain the reason why Parallels cannot simply connect to a USB printer with the real printer driver? Only then would Parallels be living up to its claim of easy USB connectivity.
Thanks...
Rick
To take another crack at your question, it sounds like you are not familiar with the concept of virtual machines.
Parallels can, quite easily, connect to a USB printer with the real windows printer driver. It just cannot do so while another computer is attached to the printer.
Picture that you have a real OSX machine sitting on your desk. It has a real USB adapter and a real printer attached. Now picture that you have a virtual windows machine sitting beside your OSX machine on your desk. Can it print to the printer? No, because it is not attached. You must unplug the USB cable from the OSX machine, and plug it into the XP machine. You might even have to reboot the printer.
Fortunately, with Parallels, this business of having to unplug the cable and replug it into your VM can be done through software. You just have to go to Parallels/Devices/USB and click on the printer you want to use. This tells Parallels to unhook the printer from the OSX machine and to attach it to the XP VM. You will not be able to print from OSX until you release the printer (or power down your VM).
If you think about it, it has to work this way. Sometimes you want the printer attached to OSX and sometimes you want the printer attached to windows. But how would Parallels know this unless you tell it? Murphy's law ensures that the printer will always be attached in the opposite place to where you currently need it.
The Bonjour solution solves this issue by making the OSX machine a printer server, so that both machines can print to the printer with no muss, no fuss and no reconnections.
But the USB option is there if you want it.