Resolver,
I'll try to be constructive.
I think we understand the importance of backing up things and certainly, yours is sage advice to all of us. However, from a simply business perspective, from what I am seeing here, the majority of satisfied Parallels customers would be classified as "early adopters". That is. those types of people who are knowledgeable and will work willingly with Parallels to tweak the software to get it going and keep it going. If you want to transition your company, and far be it for me to suggest to you how to do that but I'm going to anyway, so read on, I think you need to seriously consider that the early majority are going to need software that is rock solid and has few problems. I think in the past, Parallels has played to game fairly well. The beta program involves the early adopters and satisfies their thirst for new features and it provides invaluable feedback to your team to identify and fix the bugs. From what I see, you have created a fanatical following of users of your product. The former GA code is good for the early majority. Where I think there may be a problem is that I feel you may have been a bit hasty in the release of 3188. as it appears to have far too many problems.
Now, let me get back to the subject of this thread. I am not running Zone Alarm. My VM crashes unexpectedly from time to time. I sense that it has something to do with the networking as I think most times it has crashed I've been in the windows explorer. I am clearly an early adopter. However, to put this all in perspective, if I am doing a staff or customer presentation and my VM dies, that looks bad on me, looks bad on Apple and looks bad on Parallels. I'm a Mac fanatic now and I don't like looking bad. (Geez, if the guys I worked with 20 years ago heard me say that...). So, if things don't improve I may need to go back to the 1970 GA and I really do not want to do that.
Thanks for letting me have my say. I hope there is something here of value to your team.
Steve