Ubuntu 7.10 Guest on XP Pro Host: Networking Issues

Discussion in 'Linux Guest OS Discussion' started by LongFist, Apr 11, 2008.

  1. LongFist

    LongFist Bit poster

    Messages:
    7
    Hey there! I am amazed at how (relatively) simple it is to build a VM in Parallels (under WinXP/Pro). I managed to get my Ubuntu 7.10 up and running in a little less than five hours (for some reason, the installation took its own sweet time...), and after installing the Parallels Tools I can play with Ubuntu just like any other WinDoze app. But (for some unspeakable reason) I have no network connectivity from the Guest OS.

    Oh, it lets me tool around with the Network Settings, and makes like it's going to get somewhere, but I cannot ping the Host machine, and I cannot get anything else, either.

    An interesting observation: I told my "Parallels Host-Guest Virtual NIC" to use DHCP (as the hardware/host does), and then told my Guest OS (Ubuntu) to do the same. If I go to a command prompt in WinDoze and type "ipconfig all", I can see where the "Parallels Host-Guest Virtual NIC" is connected to the network, as xxx.xxx.xxx.2 - no big deal. But if I open the terminal in Ubuntu and type "ifconfig eth0 -a", I get a reported IP of xxx.xxx.xxx.44!!! Could this be part of the issue? Because my Ubuntu is deaf as a post...

    ...the main reason for doing this is so I can run my network monitor(s) [etc.] without having to dual-boot my poor notebook. So far, the notebook appears to be holding up well under the strain, except I cannot seem to perform any network activities.

    <A> Is this the normal behavior of Parallels (networking), sort of like the two IPs you use with a Router that connects you to your ISP, or should those numbers match up?

    [ The fact that I'm writing this message on the afflicted computer lends some credence to the claim that it (normally) connects to the network/internet without any hassles. ]

    Has anybody else seen/heard/observed this type of behavior? Is there any way to get this Guest OS connected?

    Thanks in advance,
     
  2. LongFist

    LongFist Bit poster

    Messages:
    7
    13 Days --- No Response in sight!

    13 Days. Wow. Good thing I'm still working on it. At Microsoft, we were only allowed the accrual of 2 days before requiring at least a callback. I'm assuming that either (a) the Techs are cherry-picking the support messages, or (b) the Techs ignore the Windows side of Parallels. <frown> Ah, well, I guess it's to be expected. I've read other messages, and seen the lack of response before. This would be a good time to develop a web-based knowledge base (hint hint), so the users could browse through a list of break/fixes, and not depend on a forum that's passively being ignored.

    As far as I could see, the previous message was a detailed request for help. Instead of name-calling, arguing, finger-pointing, knit-picking, and the like, it attempted to describe a situation in the hopes that someone, somewhere, had seen or understood what was happening. I guess being nice doesn't gather attention. But you know, guys, we (the users, clients, purchasers of your product) also talk amongst ourselves. Yes - it's true! and sometimes, we change our opinions from "best thing since sliced bread" to something less ecstatic. Until this week, I had sung praises to your product. High praise. Maybe I was premature...
     
  3. LongFist

    LongFist Bit poster

    Messages:
    7
    Is this normal?

    Status Update: I suspected that the Parallels VM Editor needed some detail surrounding the network connection. I then added another network connection, and assigned each (now there were two) to the various hardware that supported it - eth0 was assigned to my 10/100 LN Card, eth1 assigned to me Wireless 802.11b/g interface. Since I turn off the radio/modem on my wireless, that particular connection should have remain inert. However, since my machine connects to the 'Net via 10/100 hardwire interface, functionality should have been restored. No dice. And while there were two interfaces, both defaulted to "Default Adapter". Eh? What gives? So I removed one of the network interfaces - since it made no difference to the Parallels VM Editor as to where these devices should be pointing...


    Problem: Assign eth0 to my 10/100 LAN card directly, instead of "Default Adapter". At restart of VM, defaults back to "Default Adapter". Networking still inoperable from guest machine.
     
  4. SakibS

    SakibS Hunter

    Messages:
    102
    There is three different way to have internet connection in your guest VM OS>

    1. Bridge
    2. NAT
    3. Host Only Network

    Have you tried any of this? Let's try..........


    _______________

    SakibS [​IMG]
     

Share This Page