Folks:
I've been having this problem that's appeared in other threads, where after upgrading to Parallels 4.0, I now have a product that will not start with the "can't connect" error. I'm going to provide all the details I think you could possibly need to diagnose this, but I need to place a cautionary comment or two in this thread since I haven't been impressed with the way Parallels has responded to this problem in other threads. Here's my thinking:
- I will provide any and all diagnostics you want to help fix this, and the community.
- Be aware that this bug defect(s) have wasted half a day of my valuable time.
- I'm already engaged with your Sales department to use you as an alternative to VMware commercially.
- My support experience here will directly affect my purchase choices as a CTO.
- If I have a negative support experience here, I will "close the loop for you" by copying responses directly to sales to explain to them why things are not going to proceed forward, or why they are.
- Moving me to another posting, burying my request for help, will have me assume that you really don't want to help me work my problem.
- Parallels needs to be aware that people do not configure their machines just so Parallels can run. People use firewalls, and other software that are part of the "ecosystem" on our machines. VMware works fine on my machine. Other software does too. Your software has to play nicely with others.
- Asking me to delete my Network Preferences is unacceptable, unless Parallels is willing to pay me an hourly rate for my time in reconfiguring my machine and refund my upgrade price.
- I'm an experienced network engineer, supercompute designer & a bit of a coder for Wall St. - talking technical to me is cool and welcome.
- I'm reasonable, and I think your technology is very cool. Working with me means more business for your company. Lets work together.
Now that the ground rules are clear, here's the diagnostic information.
I have tried installing and un-installing 4.0 several times, including disabling the Application firewall and any other firewall software that could have / might have been running, I've also verified on a secure private network that my machine is completely open with a security network auditing tool in our lab, and installing from scratch again - this is not the issue.
I've noticed that Parallels chose to use "en4" and "en5" for the virtual interfaces it defines, whereas they were "en2" and "en3" before under Parallels 3.0
I'm running a MacBook Pro, here's the information about the machine, without the serial number:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro4,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.6 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 6 MB
Memory: 4 GB
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBP41.00C1.B03
SMC Version: 1.28f1
Here's the process table output (prl_disp_service doesn't crash):
somehosts:~ someuser$ ps auxww |grep Parallel
root 244 0.0 0.2 112444 9448 ?? S 4:33PM 0:00.71 /Library/Parallels/Parallels Service.app/Contents/MacOS/prl_disp_service -e --logfile /var/log/prl_disp_service_server.log --pidfile /var/run/prl_disp_service.pid
root 224 0.0 0.1 92140 2848 ?? Ss 4:33PM 0:00.17 /Library/Parallels/Parallels Service.app/Contents/MacOS/prl_naptd
root 69 0.0 0.0 600172 736 ?? Ss 4:32PM 0:00.02 /bin/sh /Library/Parallels/Parallels Service.app/Contents/Resources/ParallelsDispatcherService start
Here's the netstat output (I'm aware of the self-assigned IP address, it didn't work either with an assigned one, has nothing to do with anything anyway):
Luxovius:~ CKMS$ netstat -lan |grep LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.5.110 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.5.25 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.4.25 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.4.110 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.59022 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.59000 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.548 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.80 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.5902 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.5901 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.5900 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.65534 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.110 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.25 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.119 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.1080 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.2.1080 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.31416 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.64000 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.1313 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.47807 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.631 *.* LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 ::1.631 *.* LISTEN
Since you limit posts to 10,000 characters, see a follow-up post for the rest. Please increase this limit in the future.
I've been having this problem that's appeared in other threads, where after upgrading to Parallels 4.0, I now have a product that will not start with the "can't connect" error. I'm going to provide all the details I think you could possibly need to diagnose this, but I need to place a cautionary comment or two in this thread since I haven't been impressed with the way Parallels has responded to this problem in other threads. Here's my thinking:
- I will provide any and all diagnostics you want to help fix this, and the community.
- Be aware that this bug defect(s) have wasted half a day of my valuable time.
- I'm already engaged with your Sales department to use you as an alternative to VMware commercially.
- My support experience here will directly affect my purchase choices as a CTO.
- If I have a negative support experience here, I will "close the loop for you" by copying responses directly to sales to explain to them why things are not going to proceed forward, or why they are.
- Moving me to another posting, burying my request for help, will have me assume that you really don't want to help me work my problem.
- Parallels needs to be aware that people do not configure their machines just so Parallels can run. People use firewalls, and other software that are part of the "ecosystem" on our machines. VMware works fine on my machine. Other software does too. Your software has to play nicely with others.
- Asking me to delete my Network Preferences is unacceptable, unless Parallels is willing to pay me an hourly rate for my time in reconfiguring my machine and refund my upgrade price.
- I'm an experienced network engineer, supercompute designer & a bit of a coder for Wall St. - talking technical to me is cool and welcome.
- I'm reasonable, and I think your technology is very cool. Working with me means more business for your company. Lets work together.
Now that the ground rules are clear, here's the diagnostic information.
I have tried installing and un-installing 4.0 several times, including disabling the Application firewall and any other firewall software that could have / might have been running, I've also verified on a secure private network that my machine is completely open with a security network auditing tool in our lab, and installing from scratch again - this is not the issue.
I've noticed that Parallels chose to use "en4" and "en5" for the virtual interfaces it defines, whereas they were "en2" and "en3" before under Parallels 3.0
I'm running a MacBook Pro, here's the information about the machine, without the serial number:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro4,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.6 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 6 MB
Memory: 4 GB
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBP41.00C1.B03
SMC Version: 1.28f1
Here's the process table output (prl_disp_service doesn't crash):
somehosts:~ someuser$ ps auxww |grep Parallel
root 244 0.0 0.2 112444 9448 ?? S 4:33PM 0:00.71 /Library/Parallels/Parallels Service.app/Contents/MacOS/prl_disp_service -e --logfile /var/log/prl_disp_service_server.log --pidfile /var/run/prl_disp_service.pid
root 224 0.0 0.1 92140 2848 ?? Ss 4:33PM 0:00.17 /Library/Parallels/Parallels Service.app/Contents/MacOS/prl_naptd
root 69 0.0 0.0 600172 736 ?? Ss 4:32PM 0:00.02 /bin/sh /Library/Parallels/Parallels Service.app/Contents/Resources/ParallelsDispatcherService start
Here's the netstat output (I'm aware of the self-assigned IP address, it didn't work either with an assigned one, has nothing to do with anything anyway):
Luxovius:~ CKMS$ netstat -lan |grep LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.5.110 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.5.25 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.4.25 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.4.110 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.59022 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.59000 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.548 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.80 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.5902 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.5901 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.5900 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.65534 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.110 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.25 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.119 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.3.1080 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 169.245.0.2.1080 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.31416 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.64000 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.1313 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.47807 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.631 *.* LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 ::1.631 *.* LISTEN
Since you limit posts to 10,000 characters, see a follow-up post for the rest. Please increase this limit in the future.