The announcement for Parallels Compressor states that performance gains are to be most likely when using that technology because access times for stored data are supposed to reduce. On the other hand, it seems logical to me that disk compression imposes costs in terms of administrative overhead.
So you have shorter access times but more overhead when reading/writing data. What net gain (or loss) ought to be expected under normal usage conditions when enabling Parallels Compressor?
Kind regards, Malte.
So you have shorter access times but more overhead when reading/writing data. What net gain (or loss) ought to be expected under normal usage conditions when enabling Parallels Compressor?
Kind regards, Malte.