dotcomjunkie
Member
Product Activation Issues?
So, If Parallels did support a native bootcamp installation of Windows, it would necessarily have to "emulate" the native mac components (which would be different for each computer) instead of emulating another "PC" like it currently does.
I say this because Vista speaks directly to virtualization in its new EULA, and if the architecture for the native boot camp installation is not identical to what is emulated, Vista would complain and want to be activated...
Thoughts?
I have been playing around with Vista on Parallels, but I have not activated it. I want to wait until I decide whether to install natively or through parallels. I do not have a lot of extra HD space to spare and like the idea of being able to offload the Vista installation to an external HD, and then be able to run other OSes...
So, If Parallels did support a native bootcamp installation of Windows, it would necessarily have to "emulate" the native mac components (which would be different for each computer) instead of emulating another "PC" like it currently does.
I say this because Vista speaks directly to virtualization in its new EULA, and if the architecture for the native boot camp installation is not identical to what is emulated, Vista would complain and want to be activated...
Thoughts?
I have been playing around with Vista on Parallels, but I have not activated it. I want to wait until I decide whether to install natively or through parallels. I do not have a lot of extra HD space to spare and like the idea of being able to offload the Vista installation to an external HD, and then be able to run other OSes...