I not really like compare paralleles with FUSION, because think prallels its really better but why FUSION on IDLE use just 7% of system? and paralleles around 40 or 50% specially when have usb conected?
My setup is windows xp + one touchscreen USB conected, and cpu on idle its very high, around 40% or 50%.
I have configured my mac on dual view, i run window on external LCD with USB connected.
Under fusion this not happen with same setup.
Some util info to inform for make developer team take a look on this?
Unde fusion you can select 1 cpu or 2 cpu, nder paralleles, how is?
Paralleles use the 2 cores all time? just use one?
Sombody can explainme this?
Bets regards.
My setup is windows xp + one touchscreen USB conected, and cpu on idle its very high, around 40% or 50%.
I have configured my mac on dual view, i run window on external LCD with USB connected.
Under fusion this not happen with same setup.
Some util info to inform for make developer team take a look on this?
Unde fusion you can select 1 cpu or 2 cpu, nder paralleles, how is?
Paralleles use the 2 cores all time? just use one?
Sombody can explainme this?
Bets regards.