Parallels Desktop 3.0 for Mac, Build 4128.
Am wondering if there is a known issue with the Parallels NAT interface as
regards handling of NFS. If I use bridged ethernet mode, then from within
the virtual machine (Solaris 11 sxde), I can mount an NFS share just fine
from the OS X host. However, if I'm running in NAT mode I get the error
"client credential too weak" when attempting to mount the NFS share. I
find that I have to run mountd with the -n switch on the OS X host.... It's
as if the NAT translation of the NFS client request is slightly off and it no
longer appears as a NFS mount request from the root user. (I suppose I
could do some tcp packet dumps to confirm.)
So is this a known issue? FWIW, all mounts are done as root from the
virtual machine. In each case I am using the correct IP address for the
OS X host (the "real" IP in bridged mode, and the Parallels Guest-Host IP
when running in NAT mode). And the behavior is independent of whether
I use NFS over TCP or UDP. Am not running the firewall on the OS X client
and as such blockage of port 2049 is not an issue.
Dan
Am wondering if there is a known issue with the Parallels NAT interface as
regards handling of NFS. If I use bridged ethernet mode, then from within
the virtual machine (Solaris 11 sxde), I can mount an NFS share just fine
from the OS X host. However, if I'm running in NAT mode I get the error
"client credential too weak" when attempting to mount the NFS share. I
find that I have to run mountd with the -n switch on the OS X host.... It's
as if the NAT translation of the NFS client request is slightly off and it no
longer appears as a NFS mount request from the root user. (I suppose I
could do some tcp packet dumps to confirm.)
So is this a known issue? FWIW, all mounts are done as root from the
virtual machine. In each case I am using the correct IP address for the
OS X host (the "real" IP in bridged mode, and the Parallels Guest-Host IP
when running in NAT mode). And the behavior is independent of whether
I use NFS over TCP or UDP. Am not running the firewall on the OS X client
and as such blockage of port 2049 is not an issue.
Dan