First off, I'm loving this new coherenece thing (though the name needs some work--something like "integrated desktops" or "seamless desktops", or something with more marketing 'zazz like "VirtuOSity").
However, the multiscreen support seems to be broken for coherence and now for full-screen. Before, if I moved the Parallels Desktop console to my secondary monitor and fired up full-screen mode, it would occupy my entire secondary screen. Pretty swanky. However, now if I try the same thing, the full screen pops up on my primary screen no matter where I have the console.
In coherence mode, it appears to try to support multiple screens but creating one virtual display that spans both monitors. However, if both monitors aren't the same size, or if the displays are arranged in OS X such that the base lines don't match, stuff still gets cut off. In fact, if the base lines are arranged at difference levels, coherence still cuts things off even in single display mode. If I line up the bottoms of both screens in the arrangement panel of OS X, then it behaves normally for single screen mode.
B
However, the multiscreen support seems to be broken for coherence and now for full-screen. Before, if I moved the Parallels Desktop console to my secondary monitor and fired up full-screen mode, it would occupy my entire secondary screen. Pretty swanky. However, now if I try the same thing, the full screen pops up on my primary screen no matter where I have the console.
In coherence mode, it appears to try to support multiple screens but creating one virtual display that spans both monitors. However, if both monitors aren't the same size, or if the displays are arranged in OS X such that the base lines don't match, stuff still gets cut off. In fact, if the base lines are arranged at difference levels, coherence still cuts things off even in single display mode. If I line up the bottoms of both screens in the arrangement panel of OS X, then it behaves normally for single screen mode.
B