iMac Pro with 18 cores and 128GB RAM tested.
1) When setting the number of processors, it shows 32 available instead of 18 (real) processor cores. On a 4-core laptop (late 2013 MacBook Pro), it shows 4 available. I believe this is a Parallels bug.
2) We set the processors to 32, and RAM at 64GB: Performance for CFD software slower than laptop, but not by much. Geekbench shows iMac Pro >4X speed of laptop. iStat Menues showed all 36 cores (includes virtual) bouncing away most of the time.
3) We set processors to 16 (guessing likely performance issues with trying to use virtual cores?), same RAM. Performance ridiculously slow, where a 1-sec iteration on laptop took 5 minutes. iStat Menues showed 18 cores bouncing away most of the time - every other bar was bouncing to full use.
Is Parallels 13 is not ready for the iMac Pro? We are considering buying them for workstations and using them with Parallels 13.
Any ideas?
1) When setting the number of processors, it shows 32 available instead of 18 (real) processor cores. On a 4-core laptop (late 2013 MacBook Pro), it shows 4 available. I believe this is a Parallels bug.
2) We set the processors to 32, and RAM at 64GB: Performance for CFD software slower than laptop, but not by much. Geekbench shows iMac Pro >4X speed of laptop. iStat Menues showed all 36 cores (includes virtual) bouncing away most of the time.
3) We set processors to 16 (guessing likely performance issues with trying to use virtual cores?), same RAM. Performance ridiculously slow, where a 1-sec iteration on laptop took 5 minutes. iStat Menues showed 18 cores bouncing away most of the time - every other bar was bouncing to full use.
Is Parallels 13 is not ready for the iMac Pro? We are considering buying them for workstations and using them with Parallels 13.
Any ideas?