I have been (mostly) successful in running WinXP on my MacBook in the office, but its not quite seamless.
The major slow-down to productivity at present is switching from WinXP to Mac OSX. For example, I can cut a slab of data from an application in WinXP and paste it to Excel in Mac OSX, but it takes quite a long time (10-20 seconds-ish) to switch from one to the other.
My current configuration is 1 GB RAM, with Parallels automatically allocated memory (I note the max manual memory is 704 MB).
Whilst there are no apps running, I note that the Mac activity monitor registers about 810 MB memory as 'wired' and 11MB as 'free'. Does this indicate that the RAM is maxed out?
The simple maths suggests that WinXP grabs up to 700MB, leaving Mac OS X with about 300MB, and that's not very much for either platform.
Would things go a lot quicker with more, say 2GB, RAM?
The major slow-down to productivity at present is switching from WinXP to Mac OSX. For example, I can cut a slab of data from an application in WinXP and paste it to Excel in Mac OSX, but it takes quite a long time (10-20 seconds-ish) to switch from one to the other.
My current configuration is 1 GB RAM, with Parallels automatically allocated memory (I note the max manual memory is 704 MB).
Whilst there are no apps running, I note that the Mac activity monitor registers about 810 MB memory as 'wired' and 11MB as 'free'. Does this indicate that the RAM is maxed out?
The simple maths suggests that WinXP grabs up to 700MB, leaving Mac OS X with about 300MB, and that's not very much for either platform.
Would things go a lot quicker with more, say 2GB, RAM?