Thanks for the responses!
Is there any real performance disadvantage using a Bootcamp partition? Is Parallels designed to perform at it's best when installed without Bootcamp?
Jesse, I just posted this same question on this forum, but in one of the other sections and I've yet to get any reply. I'm new to Parallels, the MacBook, and Bootcamp, so perhaps you (or someone else) can answer one of my questions. Is it true that Parallels can be loaded either on Mac OS
without a bootcamp partition (and therefore Windows 7 would be on a virtual drive) OR on Mac OS
with a bootcamp partition, one partition containing Windows 7. If the latter configuration is used, is the Windows 7 virtual drive and the bootcamp partitioned Windows 7 hard drive one and the same? In other words, with the latter configuration you have the option of either booting up in Mac OS and using Parallels as one would normally do to run Windows 7, OR you can boot up directly into Windows 7 on the Windows partition? If this is true, it appears from what you've discussed above that using a "direct boot" into Windows via the partition OR using Windows via Parallels after booting to Mac OS will both result in documents, setting changes, etc being saved and accessible from Windows within Parallels AND Windows via a direct boot. Is this correct?
I also wondered if there is a performance benefit in one configuration over the other (using Bootcamp versus not). I do occasionally run software that can use quite a bit of memory, so I'm wondering which configuration would result in better performance.