na9d said:
I don't know how you guys can say that Parallels is a piss-poor product. Frankly, it works amazingly well.
Please read befor posting. No-one said that the product was piss poor, just the support. I even said that it was a good product.
na9d said:
You guys are silly calling it a worthless product.
Again, please read. No-one has said that it is a worthless product. The point was, it could be free, but if it didn't do what it's supposed to ( USB2, for example ) and they were having PAID support requests ignored, then it isn't worth it ( not the same as worthless ).
na9d said:
But have you ever tried to get support out of a company like Microsoft? Try that. If you want to call them you need to pay them $250 to discuss your problem. Trust me. I know this as I support my company's IT services.
And I take it that your request doesn't go ignored, as has been the case with several posters on this board?
pigglewiggle said:
VMware has dominated the market and boasts tens of thousands of corporate costumers. And I think parallels complete lack of support is a perfect example of their weak standing.
That was perhaps true 6 months after they had released the first GA, but they've had ample time to fix it. I think you're forgetting, Parallels isn't some recent startup. They are an established company, as is their parent ( SWsoft ).
pigglewiggle said:
It's just a bunch of folks that dove into shallow water without the due diligence.
Really? I should be careful making comments like that. In my case I already had the Win32 version of PW, and ran the PD beta for a while. I knew what I was buying. However, what sort of due diligence would have informed me that Parallels would abandon the Win32 version shortly after releasing PD? Or that running *nix OSes would be relatively ignored. Also, as has been mentioned before, how would people testing the software know about about potential problems, if they cannot find the forum?
pigglewiggle said:
And they are getting exactly what they paid for.
I would suggest that you trail through some of the problems that have been reported. A lot of them are concerned with features being heavily promoted by Parallels. I would reckon that more than a few are long time users, who have been enticed with promises of " in the next release". They are still waiting to get what they paid for.
No-one is denying that the product is good, but neither is there any point denying that the support is not as good as it should be, and claiming that it is the fault of the customer. That is simply not true.
I'm just glad that I had the URL for this forum before it was removed the main site. If it wasn't for this forum, Parallels would - and should - have been taken to task.