Is Parallels taking its' users for granted?

John@Parallels said:
It is not just next version of Parallels Desktop yo can even start Parallel Desktop without GUI, and run it in the background.
As for Parallels Workstation, version 4 is coming, we are working hard to bring it as soon as possible and it will be amazing one, and it the most probably will be free (note, this is my opinion not official)
Click to expand...

That's nonsense! You need to give everyone a free upgrade to both Parallels Desktop 4 and Parallels Workstation. I'll keep saying it until you listen. How can you even mention a version 4 of Workstation when you were promising version 3 over 15 months ago?! It still hasn't arrived and meanwhile we're still stuck on the old unstable Parallels 2.2. Are you just taking people's license fees and developing releases for internal use only? If that's not criminal, it should be!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ryanplusplus said:
John, we don't want to hear about how great Parallels 4.0 is going to be. We want to know why as paying customers we are getting the shaft with Parallels 3.0. We want to know why it is that we are not getting the features promised to us when we purchased Parallels 3.0. I purchased Parallels 3.0 as a pre-order because I trusted the Parallels team to deliver the features listed on their pre-release announcement here:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070705025352/http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/upgrade

Now many of these features are being rolled into Parallels 4.0 and all you can do is tell us how great a deal Parallels 4.0 is. I want the product that I paid for, not another $40 upgrade.
Click to expand...

The thing is - the features were NOT promised. Not that I can find anywhere in the statements. Nonetheless, it is very irresponsible for Parallels to make mention of intended free feature upgrades when the policy suddenly shifts and turns them into a paid upgrade.

M.
 
let me clarify
We do support Parallels Desktop version 3, till Parallels Desktop version 5, and new builds will be published
to add Linux support, and resolve problems may appear
 
movielad said:
The thing is - the features were NOT promised. Not that I can find anywhere in the statements. Nonetheless, it is very irresponsible for Parallels to make mention of intended free feature upgrades when the policy suddenly shifts and turns them into a paid upgrade.

M.
Click to expand...

SMP support was promised by Ben as reported here:

http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2007/1/11/6582

Linux support (support lagging 6-12 months behind is hardly 'support') and Vista Aero (and hence DX9.0 since it is required by Aero) were promised for 3.0 on their upgrade press release shortly before the release of PD3.0 here:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070705025352/http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/upgrade

Sure, Ben could have been talking out his ass and there is *technically* Linux support, but there is no way to argue the Aero/DX9.0 support promised on press release available prior to the release of PD3.0 which was all that what was available when many of us pre-ordered.
 
John@Parallels said:
it is not technical question, so you can contact sales
Click to expand...

Provide me a number and I'll be glad to call them. I've been looking on your site but it's hidden very well. I've got quite a few issues to bring up, including your inability to deliver on promises made last year.
 
I got my version in March and now I how to pay to be upgraded apart from the lack of upgrades and run arounds about how they don't support vista transparencies...very dissapointed.
 
Email support is free, and your opinion will be forwarded to management, no problem, you can mention ticket number here, and I will take care personally about that
 
John@Parallels said:
Email support is free, and your opinion will be forwarded to management, no problem, you can mention ticket number here, and I will take care personally about that
Click to expand...

You're backpedaling now.

John@Parallels said:
it is not technical question, so you can contact sales
Click to expand...

I want to contact sales, not technical support. I would appreciate an avenue for doing so, preferably by phone. This is the 3rd time I've asked in the last few minutes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top