rcarver said:
is that not the point of the new Beta, to be able to run the same version of XP natively through Bootcamp if needed and also in Parallels for less intensive operations.
I'm really not much of a mind reader, so I don't know what was in the designer's mind when direct partition access was implemented, but for myself, no, it isn't about trying to dual boot a partition.
I'm a Windows software developer, and I run Win2k wherever I can. When MS came out with XP and their prove-you-aren't-a-criminal-every-time-you-start activation thingie, I refused to play because I think the concept sucks. MS activation is one of the reasons I've gotten into the Mac (and once I did, I decided i like it). So their anti-piracy effort has basically lost them a customer. Ironic, isn't it?
In any case, if you aren't running a no-activation-required version of Windows, dual boot requires a set of activation files for each environment, and requires either manual switching (a PITA I won't put up with) or direct support for swapping all necessary files directly in Parallels, which currently doesn't exist. Also, the tools needed to get the direct boot to work in Parallels prevent MacDrive from working in bootcamp, and I find MacDrive essential.
So for me, two installations is the way to go.
Now if Parallels provided a Windows driver that would access .hdd files (via MacDrive), my life would be a bit easier, but that is probably not their highest priority.
Life is a tradeoff.