leaving...
Like some posts before me, I am seriously considering switching over to VMware. Given that pre-release Leopard versions have long been available to developers, are we supposed to draw the conclusion that 2.5 is so brittle every small change to Leopard has caused show-stopping failures in 2.5 that requires massive repairs? How about 10.5.1? How about 10.5.2? And so on? What effect does that have on our confidence in Parallels product?
As a web developer, I mainly use Parallels Desktop to run IE versions for testing. There is no economic sense for me to upgrade to 3.0. When I see the release of fixed 3.0, but 2.5 patch is still unknown days away, I cannot help but feel the suspicion that Parallels is dragging their feet in order to force customers to upgrade.
For as long as 2.5 patch is delayed, I am stuck with a product I have paid for, but is barely usable. My patience has about run out. Once I switch over to VMware, so will my recommendations to my fellow developers and friends. Parallels may lose quite a few potential customers, considering that I am seeing many Windows users buying Macs lately.
Which is really quite a pity. I do think Parallels has a nice product.