Starting a virtual machine crashes Mac Pro (new Intel tower)

faddante

Bit poster
I just bought a new Mac Pro (Intel tower) this morning. I installed Parallels (I tried both the 1848 build and the latest beta)... The installation went fine, I was able to create the virtual machine just fine... However, as soon as I go to "Power On" the virtual machine for the first time, it crashes my computer (I get the translucent grey Apple screen that locks up my computer and says that I need to reboot my computer). Every once and a while, it won't crash my computer, but I will get a Parallels error dialogue that says "Unable to connect to hypervision".

I tried uninstalling, rebooting, reinstalling and I still consistently have the same problem.

I looked in the console and here is the error in the panic.log:

*********

Wed Aug 9 16:38:36 2006
panic(cpu 2 caller 0x001A4115): Unresolved kernel trap (CPU 2, Type 27=Unknown), registers:
CR0: 0x80010033, CR2: 0x2d338000, CR3: 0x00fc5000, CR4: 0x000006e0
EAX: 0x0000000a, EBX: 0x6d626572, ECX: 0x00000000, EDX: 0x00e4d618
CR2: 0x2d338000, EBP: 0x14cb3b18, ESI: 0x6d616769, EDI: 0x63216e75
EFL: 0x00000246, EIP: 0x2c434fb1, CS: 0x00000008, DS: 0x2d330010

Backtrace, Format - Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
0x14cb3908 : 0x128cdb (0x3c99c4 0x14cb392c 0x131cdf 0x0)
0x14cb3948 : 0x1a4115 (0x3cf6c0 0x2 0x1b 0x3c8e48)
0x14cb3a58 : 0x19ad14 (0x14cb3a70 0x14cb0048 0x14cb0010 0x190010)
0x14cb3b18 : 0x2c171fea (0x3c93218 0x0 0x3c93204 0x199103)
0x14cb3bd8 : 0x2c1722e9 (0x3c93204 0x14cb3ec8 0x18 0x0)
0x14cb3d58 : 0x2c17058a (0x3c93204 0xc0185401 0x14cb3ec8 0x3794888)
0x14cb3d78 : 0x1f00f7 (0xa000000 0xc0185401 0x14cb3ec8 0x81)
0x14cb3db8 : 0x1e7045 (0x14cb3de0 0x297 0x14cb3e18 0x1d09ee)
0x14cb3e18 : 0x1deee9 (0x3d80d68 0xc0185401 0x14cb3ec8 0x81)
0x14cb3e68 : 0x3305b4 (0x3addf10 0xc0185401 0x14cb3ec8 0x3a273e8)
0x14cb3e98 : 0x34e881 (0x3addf10 0xc0185401 0x14cb3ec8 0x3a273e8)
0x14cb3f68 : 0x378f9c (0x3a273e8 0x3a2a940 0x3a2a984 0x0)
0x14cb3fc8 : 0x19b0ee (0x3bee680 0x0 0x19e0b5 0x31c002c) No mapping exists for frame pointer
Backtrace terminated-invalid frame pointer 0xbfffe128
Kernel loadable modules in backtrace (with dependencies):
com.parallels.kext.vmmain(2.2)@0x2c16f000

Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 8.7.2: Tue Jul 25 23:09:54 PDT 2006; root:xnu-792.10.96.obj~3/RELEASE_I386


I am hoping someone can help me with this... I really need to get this working on my computer, I use Windows just as much as I use Mac OS.

Thanks!
 
Mine had a kernel panic on the first run after installing too, but seems to run OK after Mac restart.

Relaunched Parallels several times afterward, still OK.

I get this error message from Parallels on starting XP - any ideas ?

"Your CPU supports Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x) but it is currently disabled (locked by firmware). Virtual machine will be started without VT-x support (in software virtualization mode)."

Mac Pro 2.66/ 3 GB RAM/ Win XP Pro

Thanks for all the long hours, Parallels!
 
patrickmast said:
Hey Guys,

Looks like they got it fixed!!
See http://parallelsvirtualization.blogspot.com/

To download:
http://www.parallels.com/en/download/desktop/update/

I'm not yet a MacPro user but am very interestinmg in IF this works OK now.
So, IS it? ;-))

--
Sincerely,

Patrick Mast,
xHarbour.com Inc.
http://www.xHarbour.com


I just downloaded and installed this release and it still crashes my computer. Is it possible that there are remnants of the old installation that do not get fully uninstalled with the uninstaller?

The old version has been uninstalled for some time and the computer has been working fine.

When I attempted to install the new release, it crashed during the installation process.

I rebooted my computer, it crashed upon boot.

I rebooted in safe mode, computer functioned just fine.

I tried installing Paralells while in safe boot mode and it installed just fine. However, when trying to run it, it crashed the computer. When I rebooted, it crashed the computer.
 
Simurgh said:
Why only 3.5 GB of RAM? What does having 4 do? Slow it down?

First off, Welcome to Twitchy, a voice of reason. Great first post.

Secondly, will the 3.5/4 GB barrier be lifted in a subsequent release? Would hate to have to take RAM out of my box...
 
It works, but . . .

I'm able to run Parallels without the workaround, which is good . . . but when I try to connect to the Web, the connection is as slow as molasses in January. I've tried rebooting the VM (WXP Home), rebooting my Mac Pro, installing, uninstalling and reinstalling the version of Parallel Tools that comes with the new build—nothing helps. Earlier, I was able to run Parallels with the workaround prior to the release of the new version, and the VM's Internet connection was very speedy; but either this version has introduced a glitch or I've missed something. Has anyone else encountered this problem?:(
 
Never mind!

Configuring my VM as a Host-only Network with Internet Sharing fixed the problem.

(Of course, that still doesn't explain why Bridged Networking didn't work with the new version but did with 1848.):confused:
 
I'm getting the:

"Your CPU supports Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x) but it is currently disabled (locked by firmware). Virtual machine will be started without VT-x support (in software virtualization mode)."

Error also.

I can now boot the VM, but at apparently random points during the install, it dies with a "cannot allocate memory" error.

I've got 2GB RAM, w/512MB allocated to the VM.

Mike
 
boohoo you twitchie

TwitchyOne said:
I'm totally baffled by all the gripes here about the software not being ready for the
Mac Pro. Boohoo! Cry me a river!

Twitchy One.

Twitchy, my point was...saying the fix is coming in a "real soon" and hinting at "any day now" then not delivering for a couple of weeks is just not a good business practice, and as many have stated here, it was beginning to sound like market-speak. I owned my copy of parallels THEN bought my mac pro only to find a problem once i had installed. At that point there was very little listed anywhere about incompatibilities and i wasted my time, which is important to me. Not to mention that parallels should have listed the incompatibility issue as soon as they knew it was a problem. EVERYTHING ELSE i own works fine on my pro. So, i guess what i'm saying is...so go ahead and waste your time making lists...i've got work to do. Unless it happens to you...you don't know what you're talking about!!!
 
Thanks for the update, but installing new OSes causes kernel panics every single time I try (I've tried both Ubuntu and Windows XP). I don't have an intel mac to drag an already made virtual machine from. Forked over $80 a month ago for this. I guess I'll have to wait longer to even be able to use it. Thanks for the work, though. I guess it's a step in the right direction.

What is this memory limit for, anyways? Is it because of memory limitations of virtual machines or is it suggested not to install the program on machines with more than 3.5GB of memory?
 
jbmelby said:
Configuring my VM as a Host-only Network with Internet Sharing fixed the problem.

(Of course, that still doesn't explain why Bridged Networking didn't work with the new version but did with 1848.):confused:

bridged networking never worked for me, and it does not work in the latest beta either, unless you apply the "MTU Trick" (switch to jumbo frames then back, while parallels is running)

i'm going to give a try to the host ony networking. i hope it works consistently.

(at least it's working without the -legacy flag)
 
Last edited:
The first time I ran it, it gave me the VT-X was not turned on. OK. I tried to sleep the Mac Pro. When I started Windows inside Parallels again, this time it kernel panicked. I think I prefer the non-VT-X to the kernel panics since the kernel panics killed my system with CrossOver. I'm a bit gunshy with those at the moment.
 
well, host only is not working as the "Parallels guest adapter" disappeared from the Network prefs.

I tried to recreate it, but it did not help.

Strangely, I have a Parallels Adapter in the "from" dropdown at the iternet sharing prefs, while in the checkboxlist got an "en2" only.

moreover the parallels DHCP server does not seem to be assigning IP address to my windows instance, because i have an Ip address assigned by my router in woindows. (192.168.x.x vs parallels' 10.0.10.x)

if i assign a manual IP address from the range set in the paralles' prefs, at least te packets are travellnig (tracert for example), but DNS is not working.

so back to bridged networking and the "MTU tricks" every time I restart.

i hope the next build will be better.
 
and, I managed to freeze my mac pro several times. no kernel panics, no "not responding" apps, just a frozen beach ball of dead.

this is the same bug as in the early betas (arount B2-3). somehow the non-existing (or hidden?) Parallels Guest Adapter locks up the hypervisor for a minute or two after restart, and if you happen to start your guest os in this time your system will stop responding.

i think we could have waited for a few days if this bugs were fixed before release ;]
 
and some nearly nrelated thoughts.

i wonder if parallels has a stable QA team.

we got these easy to spot bugs, and they aren't even mentioned in the release notes (well', maybe I missed them? prove me wrog please)

macs are same for every user (at least in the default config, but only defaults config should be officially supported), so testing should not be as much effort as for a windows release (ie. parallels workstation).

hell, if it runs on my [default config] mac, it should run on all [default config] macs.
 
Network not working under the new beta release on mac pro

jbmelby said:
I'm able to run Parallels without the workaround, which is good . . . but when I try to connect to the Web, the connection is as slow as molasses in January. I've tried rebooting the VM (WXP Home), rebooting my Mac Pro, installing, uninstalling and reinstalling the version of Parallel Tools that comes with the new build—nothing helps. Earlier, I was able to run Parallels with the workaround prior to the release of the new version, and the VM's Internet connection was very speedy; but either this version has introduced a glitch or I've missed something. Has anyone else encountered this problem?:(


I am having the same problem. Everytime i start a VM i get a message about the network adapter. I have set it to en0. I have a mac pro 3.0ghz with 1gig ram and no airport card. Anyone have any ideas? I would appreciate any of the help i can get.
 
Back
Top